Friday, June 4, 2010

ပူတာအုိၿမိဳ႕နယ္ ၿမိဳ႕မိၿမိဳ႕ဖမ်ား ဦးစီးက်င္းပသည့္ ကခ်င္ျပည္နယ္ၿငိမ္းခ်မ္းေရးႏွင့္ ဖြံ႕ၿဖိဳးတိုးတက္ေရး လူထု အစည္းအေ၀း အခမ္းအနား

ပူတာအုိၿမိဳ႕နယ္ ၿမိဳ႕မိၿမိဳ႕ဖမ်ားမွ ဦးေဆာင္၍ ကခ်င္ျပည္နယ္ၿငိမ္းခ်မ္းေရးႏွင့္ ဖြံ႕ၿဖိဳးတိုးတက္ေရး လူထုအစည္းအေ၀း အခမ္းအနားႀကီးအား ပူတာအုိ္ၿမိဳ႕နယ္၊ ဖုန္ကန္ရာဇီခန္းမတြင္ (၅-၅-၂၀၁၀)ရက္ေန႕ နံနက္ (၀၈း၀၀) ခ်ိန္မွ (၁၀း၁၀)အခ်ိန္ထိ က်င္းပျပဳလုပ္ခဲ့ပါသည္။
Choice

အခမ္းအနားတြင္ သဘာပတိႀကီးအျဖစ္ ၿမိဳ႕ၿမိဳ႕ဖ ဦးဆာ၀မ္ဖုန္မွ ေဆာင္႐ြက္ၿပီး သဘာပတိ အဖြဲ႕၀င္မ်ားအျဖစ္ ၿမိဳ႕မိၿမိဳ႕ဖမ်ားျဖစ္ၾကေသာ ဦးေစာဝင္းခြန္ႏွင့္ ဦးေခ်ာေနပါးတို႕က ေဆာင္ရြက္ခဲ့ၾကၿပီး သဘာပတိ ဦးဆာ၀မ္ဖုန္မွ အဖြင့္အမွာစကား ေျပာၾကားျခင္း၊ ၿမိဳ႕မိၿမိဳ႕ဖ ဦးေနာ္ခမ္းမုိင္မွ ကခ်င္ျပည္နယ္၊ ၿငိမ္းခ်မ္းေရးႏွင့္ ဖြံ႕ၿဖိဳးတိုးတက္ေရးအဆိုအား တင္သြင္းၿပီး ၿမိဳ႕မိၿမိဳ႕ဖ ဦးငြါးဒီးေယာ္ႏွင့္ ေဒၚနန္းအဲလား တို႔က ဦးေနာ္ခမ္းမုိင္ တင္သြင္းသည့္ အဆိုအား ေထာက္ခံတင္ျပခဲ့ၾကပါသည္။
Choice
Choice
ထို႕ေနာက္ ကခ်င္ျပည္နယ္ၿငိမ္းခ်မ္းေရးႏွင့္ ဖြံ႕ၿဖိဳးတိုးတက္ေရးအဆိုအား သဘာပတိႀကီးမွ အခမ္းအနားသို႕ တက္ေရာက္လာၾကသည့္ ပရိတ္သတ္ထံ အတည္ျပဳခ်က္ေတာင္းခံျခင္းႏွင့္ ဆံုးျဖတ္ခ်က္ မ်ားခ်မွတ္ရာတြင္ ကခ်င္ျပည္နယ္ ၿငိမ္းခ်မ္းေရးႏွင့္ဖြံ႕ၿဖိဳးတိုးတက္ေရး ေထာက္ခံေၾကာင္း ဆံုးျဖတ္ခဲ့ ၾကေၾကာင္း ။
Choice

အခမ္းအနားသုိ႕ ၿမိဳ႕နယ္ေအးခ်မ္းသာယာေရးႏွင့္ ဖြံ႕ၿဖိဳးေရးေကာင္စီဥကၠဌႏွင့္ အတြင္းေရးမွဴး၊ အဖြဲ႕၀င္မ်ား၊ ၿမိဳ႕မိၿမိဳ႕ဖမ်ား၊ ဌာနဆိုင္ရာ အႀကီးအကဲမ်ား၊ ျပည္ေထာင္စုၾကံ႕ခိုင္ေရးႏွင့္ ဖြံ႕ၿဖိဳးေရးအသင္း အလုပ္အမႈေဆာင္အဖြဲ႕၀င္မ်ား၊ အသင္း၀င္မ်ား၊ လူမႈေရးအသင္းအဖြဲ႕၀င္မ်ားမွ ကိုယ္စားလွယ္မ်ား၊ ကခ်င္႐ိုးရာ စာေပႏွင့္ ယဥ္ေက်းမႈကုိယ္စားလွယ္မ်ား၊ ႐ွမ္း႐ိုးရာ စာေပႏွင့္ ယဥ္ေက်းမႈ ကိုယ္စားလွယ္မ်ား၊ ဘာသာေရးအဖြဲ႕အစည္းမ်ားမွ ကိုယ္စားလွယ္မ်ား၊ မိဘျပည္သူမ်ား၊ စုစုေပါင္း (၄၀၀)ဦး တက္ေရာက္ ခဲ့ပါသည္။

- ျပည္ေထာင္စုမၿပိဳကြဲေရး (ဒို႕အေရး ဒို႕အေရး)
- တိုင္းရင္းသားစည္းလံုးညီညြတ္မႈမၿပိဳကြဲေရး (ဒို႕အေရး ဒို႕အေရး)
- အခ်ဳပ္အျခာအာဏာ တည္တံ့ခိုင္ၿမဲေရး (ဒို႕အေရး ဒို႕အေရး)
- ႏိုင္ငံေတာ္ေ႐ွ႕ဆက္သြားမည့္ မူ၀ါဒလမ္းစဥ္(၇)ရပ္ ေအာင္ျမင္ေရး (ဒို႕အေရး ဒုိ႕အေရး)
တုိ႕ျဖင့္ ေၾကြးေၾကာ္လွ်က္ ေအာင္ျမင္စြာ က်င္းပၿပီးစီးခဲ့ပါသည္။
Choice

တႏိုင္းၿမိဳ႕နယ္ ၿမိဳ႕မိၿမိဳ႕ဖမ်ား ဦးစီးက်င္းပသည့္ ကခ်င္ျပည္နယ္ၿငိမ္းခ်မ္းေရးႏွင့္ ဖြံ႕ၿဖိဳးတိုးတက္ေရး လူထု အစည္းအေ၀း အခမ္းအနား

တႏိုင္းၿမိဳ႕နယ္ ၿမိဳ႕မိၿမိဳ႕ဖမ်ားမွ ဦးေဆာင္၍ ကခ်င္ျပည္နယ္ၿငိမ္းခ်မ္းေရးႏွင့္ ဖြံ႕ၿဖိဳးတိုးတက္ေရး လူထုအစည္းအေ၀း အခမ္းအနားႀကီးအား တႏိုင္းၿမိဳ႕နယ္၊ ဟူးေကာင္းခန္းမတြင္ (၅-၅-၂၀၁၀)ရက္ေန႕ နံနက္ (၀၉း၀၀) ခ်ိန္မွ (၀၉း၅၀)ခ်ိန္ထိ က်င္းပျပဳလုပ္ခဲ့ပါသည္။
Choice
အခမ္းအနားတြင္ သဘာပတိႀကီးအျဖစ္ ၿမိဳ႕ၿမိဳ႕ဖ ဦးကဆုန္းဆင္း၀ါးေနာ္မွ ေဆာင္႐ြက္ၿပီး သဘာပတိ အဖြဲ႕၀င္မ်ားအျဖစ္ ၿမိဳ႕မိၿမိဳ႕ဖမ်ားျဖစ္ၾကေသာ ဦးျမင့္ေသာင္းႏွင့္ ဦးစံေဌး တို႕က ေဆာင္ရြက္ခဲ့ၾကၿပီး သဘာပတိ ဦးကဆုန္းဆင္း၀ါးေနာ္မွ အဖြင့္အမွာစကား ေျပာၾကားျခင္း၊ ၿမိဳ႕မိၿမိဳ႕ဖ ေဒၚလုမိုင္မွ ကခ်င္ျပည္နယ္၊ ၿငိမ္းခ်မ္းေရးႏွင့္ဖြံ႕ၿဖိဳးတိုးတက္ေရးအဆိုအား တင္သြင္းၿပီး ၿမိဳ႕မိၿမိဳ႕ဖ ဦးေန၀င္းႏွင့္ ဦးသန္းဦးတို႔က ေဒၚလုမိုင္တင္သြင္းသည့္ အဆိုအား ေထာက္ခံတင္ျပခဲ့ၾကပါသည္။
Choice
Choice
ထို႕ေနာက္ ကခ်င္ျပည္နယ္ၿငိမ္းခ်မ္းေရးႏွင့္ ဖြံ႕ၿဖိဳးတိုးတက္ေရးအဆိုအား သဘာပတိႀကီးမွ အခမ္းအနားသို႕ တက္ေရာက္လာၾကသည့္ ပရိတ္သတ္ထံ အတည္ျပဳခ်က္ေတာင္းခံျခင္းႏွင့္ ဆံုးျဖတ္ခ်က္ မ်ား ခ်မွတ္ရာတြင္ ကခ်င္ျပည္နယ္ ၿငိမ္းခ်မ္းေရးႏွင့္ဖြံ႕ၿဖိဳးတိုးတက္ေရး ေထာက္ခံေၾကာင္း ဆံုးျဖတ္ခဲ့ ၾကေၾကာင္း ။
Choice

အခမ္းအနားသုိ႕ ၿမိဳ႕နယ္ေအးခ်မ္းသာယာေရးႏွင့္ ဖြံ႕ၿဖိဳးေရးေကာင္စီဥကၠဌႏွင့္ အတြင္းေရးမွဴးမ်ား၊ အဖြဲ႕၀င္မ်ား၊ ၿမိဳ႕မိၿမိဳ႕ဖမ်ား၊ ဌာနဆိုင္ရာ အႀကီးအကဲမ်ား၊ ျပည္ေထာင္စုၾကံ႕ခိုင္ေရးႏွင့္ ဖြံ႕ၿဖိဳးေရးအသင္း အလုပ္အမႈေဆာင္အဖြဲ႕၀င္မ်ား၊ အသင္း၀င္မ်ား၊ လူမႈေရးအသင္းအဖြဲ႕၀င္မ်ားမွ ကိုယ္စားလွယ္မ်ား၊ ကခ်င္႐ိုးရာ စာေပႏွင့္ ယဥ္ေက်းမႈကုိယ္စားလွယ္မ်ား၊ ႐ွမ္း႐ိုးရာ စာေပႏွင့္ ယဥ္ေက်းမႈ ကိုယ္စားလွယ္မ်ား၊ ဘာသာေရးအဖြဲ႕အစည္းမ်ားမွ ကိုယ္စားလွယ္မ်ား၊ မိဘျပည္သူမ်ား၊ စုစုေပါင္း (၆၅၂)ဦး တက္ေရာက္ ခဲ့ပါသည္။

- ျပည္ေထာင္စုမၿပိဳကြဲေရး (ဒို႕အေရး ဒို႕အေရး)
- တိုင္းရင္းသားစည္းလံုးညီညြတ္မႈမၿပိဳကြဲေရး (ဒို႕အေရး ဒို႕အေရး)
- အခ်ဳပ္အျခာအာဏာ တည္တံ့ခိုင္ၿမဲေရး (ဒို႕အေရး ဒို႕အေရး)
- ႏိုင္ငံေတာ္ေ႐ွ႕ဆက္သြားမည့္ မူ၀ါဒလမ္းစဥ္(၇)ရပ္ ေအာင္ျမင္ေရး (ဒို႕အေရး ဒုိ႕အေရး)
တုိ႕ျဖင့္ ေၾကြးေၾကာ္လွ်က္ ေအာင္ျမင္စြာ က်င္းပၿပီးစီးခဲ့ပါသည္။
Choice

မုိးေကာင္းၿမိဳ႕နယ္ ၿမိဳ႕မိၿမိဳ႕ဖမ်ား ဦးစီးက်င္းပသည့္ ကခ်င္ျပည္နယ္ၿငိမ္းခ်မ္းေရးႏွင့္ ဖြံ႕ၿဖိဳးတိုးတက္ေရး လူထု အစည္းအေ၀း အခမ္းအနား

မုိးေကာင္းၿမိဳ႕နယ္ ၿမိဳ႕မိၿမိဳ႕ဖမ်ားမွ ဦးေဆာင္၍ ကခ်င္ျပည္နယ္ၿငိမ္းခ်မ္းေရးႏွင့္ ဖြံ႕ၿဖိဳးတိုးတက္ေရး လူထုအစည္းအေ၀း အခမ္းအနားႀကီးအား မုိးေကာင္းၿမိဳ႕နယ္၊ မုိးေကာင္းခန္းမတြင္ (၅-၅-၂၀၁၀) ရက္ေန႔ နံနက္ (၀၉း၄၅) ခ်ိန္မွ (၀၉း၅၅)အခ်ိန္ထိ က်င္းပျပဳလုပ္ခဲ့ပါသည္။
Choice
အခမ္းအနားတြင္ သဘာပတိႀကီးအျဖစ္ ၿမိဳ႕ၿမိဳ႕ဖ ဦးစုိင္းေနာ္မွ ေဆာင္႐ြက္ၿပီး သဘာပတိ အဖြဲ႕၀င္မ်ားအျဖစ္ ၿမိဳ႕မိၿမိဳ႕ဖမ်ားျဖစ္ၾကေသာ ဦးမ်ဳိးေအးႏွင့္ဦးစိုးႏြယ္တို႕က ေဆာင္ရြက္ခဲ့ၾကၿပီး သဘာပတိ ဦးစုိင္းေနာ္မွ အဖြင့္အမွာစကား ေျပာၾကားျခင္း၊ ၿမိဳ႕မိၿမိဳ႕ဖ ဦးမင္းကုိေလးမွ ကခ်င္ျပည္နယ္၊ ၿငိမ္းခ်မ္းေရးႏွင့္ ဖြံ႕ၿဖိဳးတိုးတက္ေရးအဆိုအား တင္သြင္းၿပီး ၿမိဳ႕မိၿမိဳ႕ဖ ေဒၚႏူးရာႏွင့္ ေဒါက္တာရီရီသိန္းတို႔က ဦးမင္းကိုေလး တင္သြင္းသည့္ အဆိုအား ေထာက္ခံတင္ျပခဲ့ၾကပါသည္။
Choice
Choice
ထို႕ေနာက္ ကခ်င္ျပည္နယ္ၿငိမ္းခ်မ္းေရးႏွင့္ ဖြံ႕ၿဖိဳးတိုးတက္ေရးအဆိုအား သဘာပတိႀကီးမွ အခမ္းအနားသို႕ တက္ေရာက္လာၾကသည့္ ပရိတ္သတ္ထံ အတည္ျပဳခ်က္ေတာင္းခံျခင္းႏွင့္ ဆံုးျဖတ္ခ်က္ မ်ားခ်မွတ္ရာတြင္ ကခ်င္ျပည္နယ္ ၿငိမ္းခ်မ္းေရးႏွင့္ဖြံ႕ၿဖိဳးတိုးတက္ေရး ေထာက္ခံေၾကာင္း ဆံုးျဖတ္ခဲ့ ၾကေၾကာင္း ။
Choice

အခမ္းအနားသုိ႕ ၿမိဳ႕နယ္ေအးခ်မ္းသာယာေရးႏွင့္ ဖြံ႕ၿဖိဳးေရးေကာင္စီဥကၠဌႏွင့္ အတြင္းေရးမွဴး၊ အဖြဲ႕၀င္မ်ား၊ ၿမိဳ႕မိၿမိဳ႕ဖမ်ား၊ ဌာနဆိုင္ရာ အႀကီးအကဲမ်ား၊ ျပည္ေထာင္စုၾကံ႕ခိုင္ေရးႏွင့္ ဖြံ႕ၿဖိဳးေရးအသင္း အလုပ္အမႈေဆာင္အဖြဲ႕၀င္မ်ား၊ အသင္း၀င္မ်ား၊ လူမႈေရးအသင္းအဖြဲ႕၀င္မ်ားမွ ကိုယ္စားလွယ္မ်ား၊ ကခ်င္႐ိုးရာ စာေပႏွင့္ ယဥ္ေက်းမႈကုိယ္စားလွယ္မ်ား၊ ႐ွမ္း႐ိုးရာ စာေပႏွင့္ ယဥ္ေက်းမႈ ကိုယ္စားလွယ္မ်ား၊ ဘာသာေရးအဖြဲ႕အစည္းမ်ားမွ ကိုယ္စားလွယ္မ်ား၊ မိဘျပည္သူမ်ား၊ စုစုေပါင္း (၆၀၀)ဦး တက္ေရာက္ ခဲ့ပါသည္။

- ျပည္ေထာင္စုမၿပိဳကြဲေရး (ဒို႕အေရး ဒို႕အေရး)
- တိုင္းရင္းသားစည္းလံုးညီညြတ္မႈမၿပိဳကြဲေရး (ဒို႕အေရး ဒို႕အေရး)
- အခ်ဳပ္အျခာအာဏာ တည္တံ့ခိုင္ၿမဲေရး (ဒို႕အေရး ဒို႕အေရး)
- ႏိုင္ငံေတာ္ေ႐ွ႕ဆက္သြားမည့္ မူ၀ါဒလမ္းစဥ္(၇)ရပ္ ေအာင္ျမင္ေရး (ဒို႕အေရး ဒုိ႕အေရး)
တုိ႕ျဖင့္ ေၾကြးေၾကာ္လွ်က္ ေအာင္ျမင္စြာ က်င္းပၿပီးစီးခဲ့ပါသည္။
Choice

Thursday, June 3, 2010

ျမစ္ႀကီးနားၿမိဳ႕နယ္ ၿမိဳ႕မိၿမိဳ႕ဖမ်ား ဦးစီးက်င္းပသည့္ အဖ်က္လုပ္ရပ္မ်ားအား ဆန္႕က်င္႐ႈတ္ခ်ပြဲ အခမ္းအနား

ျမစ္ႀကီးနားၿမိဳ႕နယ္ ၿမိဳ႕မိၿမိဳ႕ဖမ်ားမွ ဦးေဆာင္၍ အဖ်က္လုပ္ရပ္မ်ားအား ဆန္႕က်င္႐ႈတ္ခ်ပြဲ အခမ္းအနားႀကီးအား ျမစ္ႀကီးနားၿမိဳ႕၊ ျမစ္ႀကီးနားဘူတာႀကီးတြင္ (၂-၆-၂၀၁၀)ရက္ေန႕ ညေန(၃)နာရီတြင္ က်င္းပျပဳလုပ္ခဲ့ပါသည္။
Choice

Choice
Choice
Choice
Choice

အခမ္းအနားတြင္ သဘာပတိႀကီးအျဖစ္ ၿမိဳ႕ၿမိဳ႕ဖ ဦးခင္ေမာင္လွ မွ ေဆာင္႐ြက္ၿပီး သဘာပတိ အဖြဲ႕၀င္မ်ားအျဖစ္ ၿမိဳ႕မိၿမိဳ႕ဖမ်ားျဖစ္ၾကေသာ ဦးခမိုင္တန္ႏွင့္ ဦးစိုင္းယီက်န္ တို႕က ေဆာင္ရြက္ခဲ့ၾကၿပီး သဘာပတိ ဦးခင္ေမာင္လွမွ အဖြင့္အမွာစကား ေျပာၾကားျခင္း၊ ၿမိဳ႕မိၿမိဳ႕ဖ ဦးဇုန္းတိန္႕မွ ကခ်င္ျပည္နယ္၊ ျမစ္ႀကီးနားၿမိဳ႕နယ္အတြင္း အဖ်က္လုပ္ရပ္မ်ားအား ဆန္႕က်င္ေၾကာင္း အဆိုအား တင္သြင္းၿပီး ကခ်င္ ျပည္နယ္ ကုန္သည္ႀကီးမ်ားႏွင့္ စက္မႈလုပ္ငန္း႐ွင္မ်ားအသင္း အတြင္းေရးမွဴး ဦး၀င္းဟန္သန္းႏွင့္ ျမစ္ႀကီးနားၿမိဳ႕ စည္ပင္သာယာေစ်း(၂)၊ ေစ်းမိေစ်းဖ ေဒၚေက်ာ့ေက်ာ့တို႕က ဦးဇုန္းတိန္း တင္သြင္းသည့္ အဆိုအား ေထာက္ခံတင္ျပခဲ့ၾကပါသည္။

ထို႕ေနာက္ အဖ်က္လုပ္ရပ္မ်ားအား ဆန္႕က်င္႐ႈတ္ခ်သည့္ အဆိုအား သဘာပတိႀကီးမွ အခမ္းအနားသို႕ တက္ေရာက္လာၾကသည့္ ပရိတ္သတ္ထံ အတည္ျပဳခ်က္ေတာင္းခံျခင္းႏွင့္ ဆံုးျဖတ္ခ်က္ မ်ား ခ်မွတ္ရာတြင္ ကခ်င္ျပည္နယ္ ျမစ္ႀကီးနားၿမိဳ႕နယ္အတြင္း အဖ်က္လုပ္ရပ္မ်ားအား ဆန္႕က်င္႐ႈတ္ခ်ေၾကာင္း ဆံုးျဖတ္ခဲ့ၾကေၾကာင္း ။

Choice
Choice

အခမ္းအနားသုိ႕ ျပည္နယ္၊ ခ႐ိုင္၊ ၿမိဳ႕နယ္ေအးခ်မ္းသာယာေရးႏွင့္ ဖြံ႕ၿဖိဳးေရးေကာင္စီဥကၠဌႏွင့္ အတြင္းေရးမွဴးမ်ား၊ အဖြဲ႕၀င္မ်ား၊ ၿမိဳ႕မိၿမိဳ႕ဖမ်ား၊ ဌာနဆိုင္ရာ အႀကီးအကဲမ်ား၊ ျပည္ေထာင္စုၾကံ႕ခိုင္ေရးႏွင့္ ဖြံ႕ၿဖိဳးေရးအသင္း အလုပ္အမႈေဆာင္အဖြဲ႕၀င္မ်ား၊ အသငး္၀င္(၁၂၀)ဦး၊ လူမႈေရးအသင္းအဖြဲ႕၀င္မ်ားမွ ကိုယ္စားလွယ္(၃၄၀)ဦး၊ ကခ်င္႐ိုးရာ စာေပႏွင့္ ယဥ္ေက်းမႈကုိယ္စားလွယ္(၃၀)ဦး၊ ႐ွမ္း႐ိုးရာ စာေပႏွင့္ ယဥ္ေက်းမႈ ကိုယ္စားလွယ္(၂၀)ဦး၊ ဘာသာေရးအဖြဲ႕အစည္းမ်ားမွ ကိုယ္စားလွယ္(၁၀၀)ဦး၊ ျမစ္ႀကီးနားၿမိဳ႕၊ ေစ်းမိ၊ ေစ်ဖ၊ ေစ်းသူ/ေစ်းသား ကိုယ္စားလွယ္(၁၅၀)ဦး၊ မိဘျပည္သူ(၂၈၅)ဦး၊ စုစုေပါင္း (၁၀၄၅)ဦး တက္ေရာက္ခဲ့ပါသည္။

- ျပည္ေထာင္စုမၿပိဳကြဲေရး (ဒို႕အေရး ဒို႕အေရး)
- တိုင္းရင္းသားစည္းလံုးညီညြတ္မႈမၿပိဳကြဲေရး (ဒို႕အေရး ဒို႕အေရး)
- အခ်ဳပ္အျခာအာဏာ တည္တံ့ခိုင္ၿမဲေရး (ဒို႕အေရး ဒို႕အေရး)
- ႏိုင္ငံေတာ္ေ႐ွ႕ဆက္သြားမည့္ မူ၀ါဒလမ္းစဥ္(၇)ရပ္ ေအာင္ျမင္ေရး (ဒို႕အေရး ဒုိ႕အေရး)
- အဖ်က္လုပ္ရပ္မ်ားအား ဆန္႕က်င္႐ႈတ္ခ်ေရး (ဒို႕အေရး ဒို႕အေရး)

တုိ႕ျဖင့္ ေၾကြးေၾကာ္လွ်က္ ေအာင္ျမင္စြာ က်င္းပၿပီးစီးခဲ့ပါသည္။

Choice
Choice

Monday, September 28, 2009

Serves Whose Interest -------- ?

Today, it is clearly seen that the work of governments and citizens are all aimed at the national interests of one's own country and people. That is specially true for small countries which have been trying hard to pursue their own national interest, their long term benefits and to keep holding onto their rights to national interest. Superpowers plan preventive measures for their national interest to remain unscathed and exist permanently.

For the permanent presence of their national interest, superpowers expand their spheres of politics, economy and military by all means and at the same time, aim for other countries not to emarge powerful in terms of politics, economic and military means, other than themselves. They apparently work out to chieve their goal in terms of these three areas. They have become to make efforts contentiously to influence the smaller countries and to get hold of the leading role in the political and economic situations of other countries.

The world has seen a superpower making strategic plans to harass and deter countries likely to become its rival. Currently, the superpower-United States is seen working on its strategy to curb the gradual expansion of power and strength by China and India. Hence, the United states has obviously continued its efforts to maintain its power and strong hold in South Asia and Southeast Asia in a way, it has trained certain countries, organizations and individuals as its own affiliates to support its own national interest. Those countries and individuals have been given a lot of incentives and constantly organized to work for the interests of the United States.

United States have been apparently aiming to achieve its own interest and work out its strategy. Those values such as democracy, human rights and humanitarian consideration, are merely the instruments for achieving its own interest, which are being used as a cover-up. In fact, United States does not value the existence of democracy, human rights and humanitarian concerns of those countries. It neither worries about the non­existence of those values nor happy about their achievement in those countries. That does not mean anything to the United States. What matters is for those countries to strictly adhere to its strategy contribute to the success. As such, certain small countries are seen badly hurt and strugglig amid the United States' repeated cycle of strategy.

Looking at the situation of Myanmar, the United States aims to use Myanmar to contain China and India, in terms of geo-politics. The need to nurture its affiliated persons or organizations arises out of that objective. In connection with the 1988 disturbances in Myanmar, Daw Aung San Su Kyi and NLD party became its choice to fulfill that particular requirement. That was the time when Daw Su Kyi, as the daughter of General Aung San, was trying to take hold of the leading role in Myanmar and NLD, on the other hand, was in pursuit of power by exploiting Daw Su Kyi as a puppet-leader. NLD, in view of gaining state power, collaborated with the United States to bring about its interest.

During the 1988 crisis, despite coercion through economic sanctions by the United States, the government of Myanmar, out of its perseverance and sincerity, could bring about unprecedented development to the country.

As for Daw Su Kyi, with the support of merely a group of followers who share common interest with her, has been in the know of not earning support from the majority of the people of Myanmar, however, still, too stubborn by nature to give up. The United States, in time, has also become convinced that Daw'Su Kyi could not bring about their interest. Today, it could be seen that the NLD's strategy to work out on its interest and the United States desired interest is gradually becoming confrontational. In such circumstances, the United States would never stick to the individual of an organization whom it cannot influence any further, while the other person or organization in question would only be motivated, provided there is enough evidence for consequential face-saving. The personal background of Daw Su Kyi's past has been well collected by the United States. Based on her personal status as the daughter of General Aung San and her sharp personality, she was chosen to work out on its interest.

The real outcome and the consequences turned out against the expectations of both the United States and the NLD. The leadership of Daw Su Kyi has become unpopular in the NLD as her stances deviates from the interest of the party and the country. That was also clear to the United States and eventually led to the disintegration among the NLD.

After the visit of Senator Jim Webb, the conflict based on self-serving interest between NLD and United States became larger. Many of the NLD members were becoming unhappy to follow Daw Su Kyi's dictatorial rule. The divide was becoming more and more obvious.

There is a valid reason that as a consequence of Senator Jim Webb's visit, hindrance between the NLD against its allies and the international organizations which strongly supported the NLD were instigated. The oppositions have all along been obsessed with deposing the government which is contrary to the reconciliation. Their demand for changing the constitution is far-fetched, as experts say there is no such constitution which is entirely explicit. Referring the actions of the international community including superpowers, we could obviously see that a state constitution has to be amended or updated according to the changing patterns of time and circumstances. If supporters of foreign powers could achieve their goal within the margin of the current constitution, it is assumed that NLD supporters and NLD allies could be more in harmony.

The United States' interest in Myanmar originates way back up to 60 years ago. The policy plan of Obama Administration is to continue its old strategy in the region, backed up by NLD. In other words, the motive is to contain the rivals of Eurasia highland.

The United States views that it is important to contain the growing Chinese influence on Myanmar. The assistances, the supports, the executive and competitive capabilities of China in key sectors of Myanma economy become a matter of concern for the United States. Therefore, it is true that the United States was compelled to find a way to change their approach and policy. In the mean time, grandiloquent terms such as human rights, democracy etc. will remain popular due to the fact that circumstances now favour the United States with the emergence of NLD headed by Daw Suu Kyi in its efforts to gain a foothold in Myanmar since the beginning of the 20th century.

The economic sanctions will not be end over night. The most important American way of thinking is prioritizing their national interest. The procedures such as democracy, human rights, election etc. are merely instruments used for justification of a particular person or certain policies. In other words, it is just a mechanism to support the survival, popularity and prosperity of Daw Suu Kyi cum NLD. Therefore, it is very difficult to differentiate between the interest of the United States and that of NLD which is demanding Democracy. While implementing its interests, NLD is unable to apply the methods aspired by the United States. That is the root cause of the current tension between NLD and the United States. During the Bush administration, they mostly echoed the voice of Myanma Democracy opposition groups. It is found that they also failed to search for ways and means to counter Russia and China which have influence on Myanmar other than exerting to topple the Military Government. In contrast, Obama Administration does not solely focus on the said modus operendi . He is supposed to believe that it is one of the methods among others. Therefore, it is sure that he will be looking for the other useful ways and means.

When Mr. Jim Webb had a meeting with Daw Suu Kyi, he said that the extensive range of Chinese influence over Myanmar is a matter of US serious concern. Most of the political analysts believe that it is absolutely true. In other word, it is the first time that a senior US official informed Myanmar opposition leader of their interests. However, Daw Suu Kyi surprised her supporters from the United States and western countries by rejecting what M. Jim Webb' had told her. Daw Suu Kyi not only opposed it but also believed that it is just an excessive concern over trivial things. We can deduce from this point that there exists disagreement between the United States and Daw Suu Kyi ( NLD ). The NLD might think themselves that her response is appropriate. However, Myanma Democracy supporters believed that she made one more mistake to this end.

The NLD opposition might not accept the fact that generating conflicts between China and Myanmar Military Government may be antithetical to the interest of Myanmar people. China will only be anxious about its interests. There are some critism that undermining the Chinese interests in Myanmar and their investments means making their own power decreased for NLD . The NLD made fun of the Chinese policy due to the lengthy detention of Daw Suu Kyi. It is not an accident that such slanderous attacks on Chinese policy serve the interest of the United States.

Following his meeting with Daw Suu Kyi, Mr. Jim Webb made a press conference in Thailand. May be he is optimistic, he said that Daw Suu Kyi seemed to be in a position to agree with him on the topic of sanction. However, sanction is the important weapon for Daw Suu Kyi and NLD. Thus, Jim Webb's description came as a terrible shock to the NLD community. In fact, it is said in the NLD community that when it comes to sanction, Daw Suu Kyi used ambiguous words and her usage was unclear. Some said that Daw Suu Kyi still firmly stands on her policy toward sanction and it remains unchanged. NLD community said that without receving overture first from Military Government, they will not be able to address the issue of sanction. In other word, the opposition groups believe that only when progress is made in reconciliation, will they give up the issue of sanction inevitably. The NLD is supposed to believe that until and unless their victory could be ensured, they will continue to practice the existing policy of sanction. The NLD followers' way of thinking is exactly the same with that of Daw Suu Kyi. The NLD followers said that since they have already made a huge investment in the path of sanction, it is impossible to change their stance and they will therefore continue to hold on to that policy. At the same time, the United States seems to presume that the NLD is moving toward the existing path which is unsuccessful.

It is questionable that standing firmly on and speaking sternly about the policy of sanction by NLD while asking Democracy in order to bring Myanmar issue to an end is whether for the sake of attaining power or for the betterment of the people.

Poverty, hardship and sanction which always hinder development are unnecessary things for the interest of the entire Myanmar people,. It is questionable that sticking to the way of sanction is really for the interest of the people. It will be very difficult to justify that holding on dogmatically to the policy of sanction does not aim toward collapsing the government or taking power. However, can they really come into power in this way?
Therefore, it is found that the United States has a series of serious concerns in Myanma issue and they feel uncertain about whether it can serve their interest and aspiration or not.

Tuesday, August 18, 2009

Chairman of the State Peace and Development Council issues directive dated 10 August 2009 for Ministry of Home Affairs stating upon Court pronouncing sentence to Daw Aung San Suu Kyi, sentence to be served by her under Criminal Procedure Code be amended to be remitted and suspended if she displays good conduct and pardon be granted accordingly

The Chairman of the State Peace and Development Council issued a directive dated 10 August 2009 for the Ministry of Home Affairs stating upon the Court pronouncing sentence to Daw Aung San Suu Kyi, the sentence to be served by her under the Criminal Procedure Code be amended to be remitted and suspended if she displays good conduct and pardon be granted accordingly. The full text of the directive is as follows:

Union of Myanmar
Office of the Chairman of
the State Peace and Development Council

Letter No 04/NaYaKa (Oo)/La Nga Hka
Dated 10th August 2009


To:
The Minister,

Ministry of Home Affairs.

Subject: Upon the Court pronouncing sentence to Daw Aung San Suu Kyi (father U Aung San) the sentence to be served by her under the Criminal Procedure be amended to be remitted and suspensed if she displays good conduct and pardon be granted accordingly.

1. The Northern District Court of the Yangon Division by Criminal Regular Trial 47/2009 in accordance with the Law Safeguarding the State Against the Danger of Subversive Elements, Section 22 instituted the case for breach of provision against Daw Aung San Suu Kyi (father U Aung San) unavoidably by responsible persons, and the State Peace and Development Council is aggrieved at the said action.

2. However, for the sake of the rule of Law, judicial proceedings justly made in accordance with existing law shall be respected and abided by all citizens.

3. Daw Aung San Suu Kyi, being the daughter of Bogyoke Aung San who sacrificed his life for the independence of Myanmar, viewing that peace, tranquility and stability will prevail, that no malice be held against each other, that there be no obstruction in the path to democracy, the Chairman of the State Peace and Development Council desires within the ambits of his rights and powers to exercise leniency upon her.

4. Thus upon the Court finding Daw Aung San Suu Kyi guilty to have committed the offence pronounced sentence accordingly. Whatsoever sentence be pronounced, it is amended under Criminal Procedure Code Section 401, Sub-Section (5) that the half of the sentence to be served is remitted and the remainder of the sentence is to be suspended.

5. During the period of suspended sentence, in paragraph 4, Daw Aung San Suu Kyi shall reside in her residence, No 54/56 University Avenue, Shwetaunggyar Quarters No. 1, Bahan Township, in accordance with the annexed stipulations.

6. It is informed that should Daw Aung San Suu Kyi abide in accordance with the annexed stipulations in good conduct during the suspended period and not exceeding such period, all suspended sentences shall be pardoned.
Chairman
State Peace and Development Council

Under the directive of the Chairman of the State Peace and Development Council, the Ministry of Home Affairs issued an order dated 10 August and informed Daw Aung San Suu Kyi of the order and read it to her.


The first step of a long journey

Senator Mr Jim Webb, Chairman of the East Asian and Pacific Affairs Subcommittee of the US
Senate Foreign Relations Committee has just completed his visit to Myanmar. Mr Yettaw went along with Mr Jim Webb to be home. The Senator’s tour of Myanmar was welcomed and recognized both locally and globally as a successful visit that helps deepen the relations between the US and Myanmar and reflects Myanmar’s magnanimity and consideration.

During his visit to Myanmar, Mr Jim Webb met Head of State Senior General Than Shwe and also with the Prime Minister and the Foreign Affairs Minister and exchanged views. Moreover, he held meetings with the State Constitution Drafting Commission,social organizations, national race armed groups that have returned to the legal fold, and officially
registered political parties. He also had talks with Daw Aung San Suu Kyi. The meetings indicated that the government cooperated in all seriousness with Mr Jim Webb in his mission.

International media praised Mr Jim Webb for the good job for his compatriot Mr Yettaw. At his call on the Head of State, Mr Jim Webb made two requests: to release Mr Yettaw who was punished for his violation of Myanmar law, and to let him meet Daw Aung San Suu Kyi.

Mr Jim Webb said that Mr Yettaw committed a serious crime according to the Myanmar law, so he did not want to ask a pardon; that however he requested that the government release Mr Yettaw from the social grounds; that the Myanmar government fulfilled his request with goodwill from the humanitarian grounds in the framework of the law; and that so Mr Yettaw had reunited with his family.

In my opinion, Mr Yettaw was found guilty, but the case was worthy of consideration due to his bad health conditions. According to the clarification the chief of the Myanmar Police Force made at the press conference recently, he was in serious condition owing to the fact that he did not have meals for months. The government provided health care to him, spending a lot of
money. At the requests of Mr Jim Webb and the US Embassy in Myanmar, the government issued an order on humanitarian grounds to commute half of the US citizen Mr Yettaw’s seven years’ prison term and suspend the remaining prison term and to deport him for his health and future and as a gesture of considering relations between the US and Myanmar. Now, he has
left Myanmar together with Mr Jim Webb.

After the order was read, Mr Yettaw and his 13 belongings and 17 kinds of medicine were handed over to the US consul. It was made known to Mr Yettaw that according to the order, he will have to serve the suspended term alongside a three years’ term under the Immigration Law if he enters Myanmar illegally again. The order depicts that the nation has an upright judicial pillar based on humanitarianism and magnanimity.

Some foreign media expressed the government’s permission to Mr Jim Webb to meet Daw Aung San Suu Kyi in his visit to Myanmar as a significant fulfilment. Their expression implicitly pointed out that the United Nations Secretary-General on his visit to Myanmar was not allowed to meet with her, because they do not notice the difference between the two situations. While the UNSG was on a visit, Daw Aung San Suu Kyi was still on trial at the court for her case and she was under the jurisdiction of the court. Now, the trial is over and she has been permitted to live in her residence under the suspended sentence. That means the government no longer needs to seek the approval of the court concerned to arrange a meeting between Mr Jim Webb and her. So, it is required of those foreign media to view the two different situations.

Being a member of the United Nations, Myanmar has been cooperating constantly with the international organization, and it will keep on cooperating actively with it. Myanmar recognizes and appreciates the good offices and efforts of the UN Secretary-General, but it did not attend to his request because of unusual situations and time. I wish those foreign media would realize that.

Furthermore, Myanmar is a member of the global family, and has positive attitude to cooperate with all other members in a friendly way. Myanmar deals friendly and equally with other countries in line with the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence. In viewing the international affairs, Myanmar does not have any discrimination against or in favour of any particular countries. On Mr Jim Webb’s visit, Myanmar enthusiastically cooperated with him because of its stance to deepen the bilateral relations and relieve the disagreements between the two countries, not because of his mother country, a superpower. If any other country is in place of the US, Myanmar’s stance will remain unchanged in that regard.

Mr Jim Webb issued a statement thanking the Myanmar government for its moves as a gesture of taking heed of relations between the two countries with correct vision. He said both the countries hoped to use the Myanmar government’s new moves as ways of building bilateral confidence and amity. At a press conference before leaving Yangon Airport, Mr Jim Webb revealed that he thanked the top leaders of the government for allowing him to meet them. His visit would help promote mutual understanding between the US and Myanmar and hold working discussions.The 2010 election needed to be free and fair and it was hoped that it would be so. Mr Jim Webb added that he was able to discuss how to overcome existing obstaobstacles
so that Myanmar’s political process acheiving its goal. He hoped that the relations between the US and Myanmar would continue to improve. He had already believed that the barriers to building amity between the two countries would be overcome some time. With a view to mending the bilateral relations, he would hold discussions based on his visit to Myanmar with the US administration and Secretary of State Hilary Clinton.

In response to a reporter’s question, Mr Jim Webb said he supposed that conventional economic sanctions against Myanmar would not yield any benefits. In reality, he was the one who opposed the economic sanctions against Myanmar. He pointed out that a negotiation through diplomatic channel was necessary in order to lift the sanctions against Myanmar gradually. But we had learnt before his visit that a spokesperson of a big opposition party
said that they could not recognize Mr Jim Webb, who opposed the economic sanctions against Myanmar, as a politician who should be welcomed and that they were indifferent to his visit as it could not be democratically beneficial.

Even an influential US senator opposes the economic sanctions against our country but it is found that anti-government Myanmar groups are demanding further economic sanctions to get their own country into trouble. They are indeed quislings. It was said that recently, the EU included more persons and organizations in the list of the economic sanctions against Myanmar. Those persons and organizations have been banned from entering the EU countries and their assets will be frozen. To make matters worse, Nwe Aung, a so-called activist of Myanmar affairs in Europe, made a shameful remark. He said they had demanded legal staff as well as insurance services and marine products should be banned. But they had not been in time to ban them. Even though the EU sanctions worked to a certain
degree, they were not satisfied with that, he said. Actually, they did not do a single thing to serve the interests of their own country and people but have been sticking to destructive acts. Their attitude and acts are so mean. If they still regard themselves as Myanmar nationals, they should not be that disloyal to their own country and people. Even a senator from a foreign country shows goodwill towards the Myanmar people. If so, Myanmar people should show more goodwill
and repay the gratitude of the State.

The US government has issued a statement welcoming the visit of Mr Jim Webb and his success. Internal and external media also remarked that Mr Jim Webb was the first person as a US top official who was allowed to meet the leader of Myanmar. His visit was more successful than expected due to the positive responses of the Myanmar government.

Looking from our side, the government has been able to show positive and friendly attitude in the area of international relations. It has also been able to show respect for humanitarianism and human rights. Moreover, it has respected the rule of law and could make a fair and right legal decision. And this must be recognized. All in all, I believe that the visit of Mr Jim Webb is a success for both sides as well as the first step to promotion of the relations between the two
countries. Indeed, it is the first step towards marching to a 1000-mile destination.

Friday, July 17, 2009

CPT Minister inspects communication tasks in Magway Division

Minister for Communications, Posts and Telegraphs Brig-Gen Thein Zaw gave instructions on better communications of trunk calls and exchange lines CPT Minister inspects communication tasks in Magway Division at GSM mobile station and Auto-Exchange in Chauk on 14 July.
The minister visited production of motorbikes at Golden Dragon Industry in Industrial Zone of Yenangyoung.The minister inspected GSM mobile station, auto-exchange and microwave station in Yenangyoung, GSM mobile station and autoexchange in Magway and auto-exchanges in Minhla and Minbu.
Yesterday, the minister visited GSM mobile station at Thit-yakauk village and satellite communications station in Taungdwingyi, and left necessary instructions.

Fight narcotic drugs with people’s power

In the world today, narcotic drugs production and trafficking is the problem facing many nations and there has been widespread use of raw opium, heroin, opium oil, liquid opium, marijuana and psychotropic substances produced with the use of chemicals.
The menace of narcotic drugs is the concern of the entire mankind. Drug abuse brings undesirable consequences not only to users but also to their families and social environment. As the danger of narcotic drugs affects every individual and every nation, it is necessary for the international community to fight it.
The threat of narcotic drugs is still enormous as there is a widespread use of psychotropic substances among the youth all over the world. They are using various kinds of drugs in various ways and therefore it is required to educate them on the dangers of drug abuse.
Myanmar has been implementing the 15-year plan for elimination of narcotic drugs since 1999 and making major strides in its anti-drug campaign due to the cooperation of the people.
Drug traffickers operate mainly in border areas. Therefore, Myanmar is also working together with her neighbours and other nations in the region to wipe out narcotic drugs. In June and at the beginning of July, a large amount of raw opium, liquid opium, heroin blocks and psychotropic
substances were siezed in Kachin State, Shan State, Mandalay Division and Sagaing Division through combined efforts of responsible personnel and local people.
As various kinds of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances are threatening the mankind and their social environment, it is necessary for regional authorities, special anti-drug squads and the people to constantly raise the momentum of the anti-drug campaign till the danger of narcotic drugs is wiped out from our soil once and for all.

Thursday, July 16, 2009

Minister inspects communication stations

Chairman of ENational Task Force Minister for Communications, Posts and Telegraphs Brig-Gen Thein Zaw attended first annual general meeting of Yatanarpon Cyber Corporation Ltd held at Sedona Hotel (Mandalay) on 12 July and made a speech on the occasion.
The following day the minister inspected Auto-Exchange and CDMA Telephone Station in Kyaukse Auto-Exchange and GSM Mobile Station in Wundwin, Auto- Exchange and CDMA Telephone Station in Meiktila, Auto-Exchange in Kyaukpadaung, Post Office, Auto-Exchange and GSM Mobile Station in NyaungU, Post Office and GSM Mobile Station in Bagan and then fulfilled the requirements.

Work together for conservation of natural teak forests

Myanmar has laid down the objectives for the forest sector and these objectives are aimed at national socio-economic development and environmental and ecological balance.In the world, Myanmar, India, Thailand and Laos are the countries where teak trees grow naturally. The teak of Myanmar has been the best and the most popular. Because of Myanmar's terrestrial, aquatic and climatic conditions, the number of naturallygrowing teak trees has been on the increase and the Bago mountain range is home to world-famous teak trees.
Natural teak forests cover about half of the nation's area. According to the records of Forest Department before 1990, there is a total of 27.29 million hectares of teak forests in the world and, out of it, 16.25 million hectares are in Myanmar. There are 12.53 million acres of teak forests in the Bago mountain range alone.
A teak-planting ceremony was held in the Margri forest reserve in Taikkyi Township on 11 July to green the Bago mountain range.
Also in Shwetaung Township, Pyay District, Bago Division, Forest Department had teak saplings planted in an acre of land in each village and three teak saplings in the compound of each household. The teak of Myanmar is famous worldwide. Therefore, young teak trees are grown at tree-planting ceremonies in the rainy season every year to prevent the depletion of teak forests.
We would like to call on the entire national people to work together for the conservation of natural resources, especially forest resources, for the sake of the environment and national economic development.

Wednesday, May 27, 2009

" ေဒၚစု " သို႕မဟုတ္ ဒုနဲ႕ေဒးနဲ႕ နံေစာ္သူ

ႏိုင္ငံေတာ္တည္ၿငိမ္ေရး၊ ရပ္ရြာေအးခ်မ္းသာယာေရးႏွင့္တရာဥပေဒစိုးမိုးေရး ဆိုတာဟာ လက္ရွိ ပကတိ အေျခအေနေတြအရ အလိုအပ္ဆံုး ႏိုင္ငံေရးဦးတည္ခ်က္ျဖစ္ပါတယ္။ ဒီနိုင္ငံေရး ဦးတည္အခ်က္ အတိုင္း အမွန္တကယ္ ျဖစ္ေပၚလာေအာင္ ႏုိင္ငံေတာ္ရဲ႕ ေဒသတိုင္း၊ က႑တိုင္း၊ လူမ်ိဳးတိုင္း၊ အလႊာတိုင္း ကလည္း ဦးလည္မသုန္အားသြန္ ခြန္စိုက္ ေန႔မအား ညမနား ႀကိဳးစားေဆာက္ရြက္ေနၾကတာ အားလံုး မ်က္၀ါးထင္ထင္ ျမင္ေတြ႕ေနခဲ႕ၾကရၿပီး ျဖစ္ပါတယ္။

ဒါေပမဲ႕ ဒီႏိုင္ငံေရး ဦးတည္းခ်က္ကို နားမလည္တဲ႕ သူေတြ ဒါမွမဟုတ္ တမင္သက္သက္ ေဘးထိုင္ ဘုေျပာၿပီး ကန္႕လန္႕ကန္႕လန္႕လုပ္ေနတဲ႕ သူေတြရွိေနတာလည္း ႏိုင္ငံေတာ္ေရွ႕ခရီးအတြက္ အေႏွာင့္အယွက္ အတားအဆီးေတြျဖစ္လို႕ ဥပေဒႏွင့္အညီ အေရးယူေဆာင္ရြက္ဘို႕လည္း လိုပါတယ္။

" ေဒၚစု "လို႕ေခၚေနၾကတဲ႕ " ေဒၚေအာင္ဆန္းစုၾကည္ " ကို ႏိုင္ငံေတာ္ရဲ႕လိုအပ္ခ်က္အရ တားဆီးမိန္႕ထုတ္ၿပီး ေနအိမ္မွာ အက်ယ္ခ်ဳပ္ထားခဲ့တာ လွည္းေန ေလွေအာင္း၊ ျမင္း ေဇာင္း မက်န္ အားလံုးအသိ တစ္္ကမၻာလံုး အသိျဖစ္ပါတယ္။

ေဒၚစု (သို႕မဟုတ္) ေဒၚေအာင္ဆန္းစုၾကည္ကို တားဆီးမိန္႕ မထုတ္ခင္တုန္းက ကန္႕သတ္မိန္႕ ထုတ္ထားခဲ့ပါေသးတယ္။ ေနာက္မွ ဆက္ၿပီး တားဆီးမိန္႕ထုတ္ခဲ့တာျဖစ္ပါတယ္။ တားဆီးမိန္႕မွာ တားဆီးထားတဲ႕ အခ်က္ သံုးခ်က္ ရွိပါတယ္။ ဒီအခ်က္ေတြကို ေဒၚစုက လိုက္နာဖို႕ တာ၀န္ရွိပါတယ္။ အဲဒိအခ်က္ သံုးခ်က္က--
(၁) ႏိုင္ငံျခားသံ႐ံုးမ်ား၊ ႏုိင္ငံေရးပါတီမ်ား၊ ႏုိင္ငံေရးပါတီမ်ားႏွင့္ အဆက္အသြယ္ရွိသူမ်ားႏွင့္ မဆက္သြယ္ရ။
(၂) ေနအိမ္ျပင္ပသို႕ လံုး၀ထြက္ခြာျခင္း မျပဳရ။
(၃) စာျဖင့္ေသာ္လည္းေကာင္း၊ စကားေၾကးနန္းျဖင့္ေသာ္လည္းေကာင္း လံုး၀ ဆက္သြယ္ျခင္း မျပဳရ။
ဆိုတဲ႕ အခ်က္ေတြျဖစ္ပါတယ္။ ဒါေတြဟာ ပညတ္ခ်က္ေတြ ျဖစ္ပါတယ္။ ပညတ္ထားတာ အဓိပၸါယ္ ရွိပါတယ္။ ပညတ္ထားတဲ႕ လူမသိဘဲနဲ႕ '' ခိုး '' ေတြ႕ရင္ '' ခိုး '' လုပ္ရင္ အျပစ္ရွိပါတယ္။

ၿပီးခဲ႕တဲ႕ ေမလ (၆) ရက္ေန႕က ကန္႕သတ္မိန္႕၊ တားဆီးမိန္႕ေတြနဲ႕ ေနေနရတဲ႕ ေဒၚစုရဲ႕ ေနအိမ္အတြင္းကို အေမရိကန္ႏိုင္ငံသာ John Willian Yettaw က တိတ္တဆိတ္ လွ်ိဳ႕၀ွက္ၿပီး ၀င္ေရာက္ ေနထိုင္ခဲ့ပါတယ္။ ဒီလို ၀င္ေနတာကို ေဒၚစုဘက္က ရိုးသားမယ္ဆိုရင္ သက္ဆိုင္ရာ လံုျခံဳေရးအဖြဲ႕ေတြကို အသိေပး ရမွာျဖစ္ပါတယ္။

သတင္းစာမွာ တီဗီြမွာေတြ႕ရတဲ႕ သတင္းေတြ၊ ဓါတ္ပံုေတြရဲ႕ အေနအထားအရ အိမ္ထဲက လွမ္းေအာ္ရင္ အျပင္က တာ၀န္ယူေနတဲ႕ လံုျခံဳေရး၀န္ထမ္းေတြ အားလံုး သဲသဲကြဲကြဲ ပီီပီျပင္ျပင္ ၾကည္ၾကည္
လင္လင္ ေကာင္းေကာင္းၾကားႏိုင္တဲ႕ အကြာအေ၀းမွာ ရွိပါတယ္။ ဒါေပမဲ႕ " ေဒၚစု "က ဒီလို မလုပ္ခဲ့ပါဘူး။ တိတ္တဆိတ္ လွ်ိဳ႕၀ွက္၀င္ေရာက္ေနထိုင္သူကို တရားမ၀င္ ခုိလႈံခြင့္ ေပးထားခဲ့ပါတယ္။ ဒီအခ်က္ကလည္း ေဒၚစုရဲ႕ မာန္ႀကီးမႈကို တစိတ္တပိုင္း ေဖာ္ျပ ေနပါတယ္။

မာန္ႀကီးတာက သူရဲ႕ကို္ယ္ေရးကိုယ္တာ ကိစၥပါ။ ဒါေပမဲ႕ တားဆီးမိန္႕ကို သိသိႀကီးနဲ႕ ခ်ိဳးေဖာက္တာကိုေတာ့ လစ္လ်ဴရွဳလို႕ ဒီ ၂၀၀၉ ခုႏွစ္ ႏွစ္ဦးပိုင္း ေလာက္က ေဂ်ာက္ဂ်က္တို႕အဖြဲ႕ရဲ႕ သီခ်င္း တစ္မ်ိဳး အေတာ္နာမည္ႀကီးခဲ့ပါတယ္။ သီခ်င္းစာသားေတြကလည္း လူငယ္ပရိတ္သတ္ေတြၾကားမွာ စိမ့္၀င္ ပ်ံႏွံ႕သြားခဲ့ပါတယ္။ " ဘူေလးလဲ " တို႕ " အမွန္ေလးပါ " တို႕ဆိုတဲ႕ စာသားေတြကို ေျပာင္းျပန္ လွန္ၿပီး ေျပာဆိုသြားခဲ့တဲ႕ စာသားေတြကိုလည္း သတိျပဳမိၾကမယ္ထင္ပါတယ္။

'' ေဒၚစု '' နာမည္ကိုလည္း စကားလိ္မ္ သေဘာနဲ႕ တစ္မ်ိဳး ေျပာၾကည့္ရင္ '' ဒုေစာ္ '' လို႕ေျပာလို႕ ရႏိုိင္ပါတယ္။ ဒါဆိုရင္ ဒုစရိုက္ေတြနဲ႕ နံေစာ္ေနသူလို႕ အဓိပၸါယ္မ်ား ႐ိွေနမလားလို႕ ေတြးမိပါတယ္။